1/26/2024 0 Comments InVia Robotics agv![]() More and more features continue to be introduced to make cobot arms safer and easier to use. Cobot arms evolved to include bump detection so that even if they did collide with a person, the robot would immediately stop and reverse itself to limit or avoid damage. These cobots had built-in sensors so they would automatically slow down or stop if a person came near. Some fifteen years ago, a new variety of robotic arms was introduced that could work alongside people. Consequently, these robot arms were caged off from the employees, and only specially trained people were allowed to go inside the fenced-in work cell with the robots. They were large and powerful, and if you got in their way, you could become seriously hurt, or even killed. These early, “non-collaborative” robots picked up engines and car frames and rapidly moved them around. Starting already in the 1950s, automobile makers were the first to adopt robot arms as part of their manufacturing process. The term has been primarily used for collaborative robotic arms, although more recently, the term Cobots has been used to describe smart carts or Person-To-Goods autonomous mobile robots in distribution centers. The result is to eliminate the bottlenecks seen with other approaches.Ĭollaborative robots or “cobots” are a relatively new development. The associates can pick orders in spurts – appropriate for humans – and the robots can work methodically 24/7 – as robots can uniquely do. The crucial advantage of the inVia system is that it decouples human and robotic processes. The associate travels very little – from one end of the PickerWall to the other at the most – a few dozen feet. The robot brings the tote to an inVia PickerWall, where associates pick items from the totes, directed by displays and pick-to-light prompts. A scissors lift enables the robot to reach up to high shelves. inVia Picker robots travel to the appropriate warehouse location and autonomously remove a tote from the shelf using a suction cup mechanism. InVia avoids these bottlenecks with a patented approach that can be described as “Totes-to-Person” or more specifically “Totes-to-PickerWall”. During peak periods, robots may bring more racks to the order-picking station than the people can handle, and again, the result is a bottleneck. Racks and goods can pile up while an associate takes a break. The disadvantage to a racks-to-person approach is that humans and machines often work at different paces. Associates see a display indicating the items to pick and the bins where they’re stowed. Low-profile, order picking robots go underneath an entire shelf of goods, lift up the shelving unit and carry it to an order-picking station. One example of GTP automation is a “Rack-to-Person” method. Goods-to-Person (GTP) order-picking automation, on the other hand, reduces walking (even more than P2G) by bringing products to a (mostly) stationary person. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |